From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Preston v. State

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
Aug 9, 2012
No. 10-11-00429-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 9, 2012)

Opinion

No. 10-11-00429-CR

08-09-2012

WILLIE EUGENE PRESTON, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


From the 54th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010-1080-C2


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Willie Eugene Preston was convicted of the offense of continuous sexual abuse of a child and sentenced to life in prison. TEX. PEN. CODE ANN. § 21.02 (West Supp. 2011). Preston complains that the evidence was insufficient for the trial court to have assessed attorney's fees and investigator's fees pursuant to Mayer v. State. Mayer v. State, 309 S.W.3d 552 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010). The State concedes that the evidence was insufficient to support that assessment. We agree that the evidence was insufficient. Preston's sole issue is sustained.

Conclusion

The evidence was insufficient for the trial court to have assessed attorney's fees and investigator's fees in the judgment; therefore, that assessment is deleted and judgment is rendered that the amount of costs owed by Preston is $700.00. As modified, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins
Modified, and as Modified, Affirmed
Do not publish
[CRPM]


Summaries of

Preston v. State

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
Aug 9, 2012
No. 10-11-00429-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Preston v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE EUGENE PRESTON, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

Date published: Aug 9, 2012

Citations

No. 10-11-00429-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 9, 2012)

Citing Cases

Moore v. State

This is particularly true where, as in this case, the amount included in court cost includes an amount for…