From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Preston v. Muniz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 26, 2017
Case No. LA CV 16-1839- ODW (JCG) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 26, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. LA CV 16-1839- ODW (JCG)

04-26-2017

JASON RICHARD PRESTON, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM MUNIZ, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and the remaining record. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. // // // //

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted;

2. Judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice; and

3. The Clerk serve copies of this Order on the parties.

Additionally, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not shown that "jurists of reason would find it debatable whether": (1) "the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right"; and (2) "the district court was correct in its procedural ruling." See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). Thus, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. DATED: April 26, 2017

/s/_________

HON. OTIS D. WRIGHT II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Preston v. Muniz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 26, 2017
Case No. LA CV 16-1839- ODW (JCG) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 26, 2017)
Case details for

Preston v. Muniz

Case Details

Full title:JASON RICHARD PRESTON, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM MUNIZ, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 26, 2017

Citations

Case No. LA CV 16-1839- ODW (JCG) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 26, 2017)