From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Preston v. Campbell

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Feb 24, 2010
No. C-05-05154 RMW (N.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2010)

Opinion

No. C-05-05154 RMW.

February 24, 2010


ORDER GRANTING IN PART PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME


On January 6, 2010, the court issued a judgment in this case. Petitioner Robert Preston moves for an extension of time to seek a certificate of appealability from the Ninth Circuit. Petitioner has represented to the court that he is proceeding pro se and has had to wait for his former counsel to forward the documentation he needs to proceed in this matter. Finding that petitioner has shown good cause, the court grants the motion for an extension of time.

However, under Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure Rules 4 and 5, the court may not provide an extension of time exceeding 30 days after the prescribed time or 14 days after the date of the order granting the motion. Therefore, the court may not extend the time for seeking a certificate of appealability until March 16, 2010, as requested by petitioner. In addition, under Habeas Corpus Rule 22(b), the notice of appeal itself constitutes a request for a certificate of appealability when a separate request has not been filed. The court has already granted petitioner until March 9, 2010 to file a notice of appeal. Accordingly, petitioner shall also have until March 9, 2010 to seek a certificate of appealability from the Ninth Circuit.


Summaries of

Preston v. Campbell

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Feb 24, 2010
No. C-05-05154 RMW (N.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2010)
Case details for

Preston v. Campbell

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT PRESTON, Petitioner, v. ROSANNE CAMPBELL, Warden of Mule Creek…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division

Date published: Feb 24, 2010

Citations

No. C-05-05154 RMW (N.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2010)