Preston v. Atmel Corporation

Full title: ROBERT E. PRESTON, Plaintiff, v. ATMEL CORPORATION, PRESTON HARTMAN, CHRIS…

Court: United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Feb 22, 2008

Civil Action No. 07-cv-01644-EWN-MJW (D. Colo. Feb. 22, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 07-cv-01644-EWN-MJW.

February 22, 2008

ORDER

EDWARD NOTTINGHAM JR., District Judge

This matter is before the court on four motions, all filed on October 9, 2007: (1) "Motion of Atmel Corp. for Partial Dismissal" (#17); (2) "Motion of Preston Hartman to Dismiss" (#19); (3) "Motion of Chris Rather to Dismiss" (#20); and (4) "Motion of Nick Reinert to Dismiss" (#21). Since these motions were filed, the court permitted Plaintiff to amend his complaint. Subsequently, all Defendants filed amended motions to dismiss. Accordingly, the motions directed at Plaintiff's inoperative initial complaint are hereby denied as moot.

Based on the foregoing it is therefore ORDERED that:

1. Defendant Atmel Corp.'s Motion for Partial Dismissal (#17) is DENIED as moot;

2. Defendant Hartman's Motion to Dismiss (#19) is DENIED as moot;

3. Defendant Rather's Motion to Dismiss (#20) is DENIED as moot; and

4. Defendant Reinert's Motion to Dismiss (#21) is DENIED as moot.