From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Preston v. Atmel Corporation

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Feb 12, 2008
Civil Action No. 07-cv-01644-EWN-MJW (D. Colo. Feb. 12, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 07-cv-01644-EWN-MJW.

February 12, 2008


ORDER


The motion (#60) to allow a rule 35 examination is DENIED for failure to comply with local rule 7.1 A. Plaintiff's counsel, however, is directed to confer (or have someone with authority confer) within twenty-four hours of the posting of this order or show cause in writing why he should not be held in contempt of court for refusing or neglecting to confer.


Summaries of

Preston v. Atmel Corporation

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Feb 12, 2008
Civil Action No. 07-cv-01644-EWN-MJW (D. Colo. Feb. 12, 2008)
Case details for

Preston v. Atmel Corporation

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT E. PRESTON, Plaintiff, v. ATMEL CORPORATION, PRESTON HARTMAN, CHRIS…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Feb 12, 2008

Citations

Civil Action No. 07-cv-01644-EWN-MJW (D. Colo. Feb. 12, 2008)