From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pressley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 17, 2006
921 So. 2d 736 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Summary

reversing the defendant's upward departure sentence where the trial court failed to state its reasons for the upward departure and directing the trial court to impose a guidelines sentence on remand

Summary of this case from State v. Dunn

Opinion

No. 1D04-0890.

February 17, 2006.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. John H. Skinner, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; John R. Alfino, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Charlie Crist, Attorney General; Thomas H. Duffy, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


This is a direct appeal from a resentencing for an offense that occurred sometime between July 12, 1997 and July 12, 2002. The challenged sentence was pronounced under section 921.0016(1)(c), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1996), and Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.703(d)(29) (1996). Although the trial court departed upwardly from the sentencing guidelines, the trial court prepared no written findings for departure as is required by section 921.0016(1)(c), nor was a transcript of sentencing signed and entered into the file at any time before appeal was taken. See Maddox v. State, 760 So.2d 89, 106-08 (Fla. 2000). Although the appellant complained of the lack of written reasons (or signed, filed transcript) in a motion filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2), the trial court denied the motion without stating reasons for departure (or signing and filing the transcript). This failure distinguishes the case from Mandri v. State, 813 So.2d 65, 66 (Fla. 2002), and brings it under Butler v. State, 765 So.2d 274, 275 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). Accordingly, here, as in Butler, we reverse and remand for sentencing under the guidelines. See also Haynes v. State, 843 So.2d 993, 994 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Edwards v. State, 770 So.2d 179, 179-80 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Edmondson v. State, 777 So.2d 434, 434 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).

REVERSED and REMANDED with directions that the trial court impose a guidelines sentence.

KAHN, C.J., and ERVIN and BENTON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pressley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 17, 2006
921 So. 2d 736 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

reversing the defendant's upward departure sentence where the trial court failed to state its reasons for the upward departure and directing the trial court to impose a guidelines sentence on remand

Summary of this case from State v. Dunn
Case details for

Pressley v. State

Case Details

Full title:Eric PRESSLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Feb 17, 2006

Citations

921 So. 2d 736 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Citing Cases

State v. Dunn

In Pope v. State, the supreme court held, "[W]hen an appellate court reverses a departure sentence because…

Murphy v. State

Moreover, the filing of an unsigned copy of the sentencing transcript would not satisfy rule 3.704(d)(27)(A),…