From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Press v. Lozier, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 30, 1997
239 A.D.2d 879 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

May 30, 1997

Present — Pine, J.P., Callahan, Doerr and Balio, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly determined that the law firm representing plaintiffs should be disqualified from further representation of plaintiffs in this action against the Town of Brighton (Town) ( see, Cardinale v. Golinello, 43 N.Y.2d 288, 295; Lasky v. Talandis, 209 A.D.2d 841; Flaum v. Birnbaum, 107 A.D.2d 1087). Attorney Rosenbaum's prior representation of the Town as Deputy Town Attorney is substantially related to the Barclay Square development that is the subject matter of this negligence action. The fact that the lawyer did not obtain any confidential information in connection with that employment is not determinative. The Town is entitled to certainty that its interests will not be prejudiced from that employment ( see, Cardinale v. Golinello, supra, at 295-296). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Mark, J. — Disqualify Law Firm.)


Summaries of

Press v. Lozier, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 30, 1997
239 A.D.2d 879 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Press v. Lozier, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ELLIOTT H. PRESS, Individually and Doing Business as WESTFALL DEVELOPMENT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 30, 1997

Citations

239 A.D.2d 879 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
659 N.Y.S.2d 648

Citing Cases

Sperr v. Seaman

This case involves a law firm which, even if for a relatively brief time, represented a client in one…

Schertz v. Jenkins

DR 5-108 reflects these separate "fiduciary duties of loyalty and confidentiality" (see id. at 616) in the…