Presley v. Bergstrom

Full title: ERIC LEE PRESLEY, JR., Plaintiff, v. ERICK BERGSTROM, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Jul 22, 2005

Civil No. 05-612-CO (D. Or. Jul. 22, 2005)

Opinion

Civil No. 05-612-CO.

July 22, 2005

ORDER

MICHAEL HOGAN, Chief Judge, District

Magistrate Judge John P. Cooney filed his Findings and Recommendation on May 11, 2005. The matter is now before me.See 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1) (B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72 (b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review.Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Judge Cooney's Findings and Recommendation. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.