From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Presidential Vill., LLC v. Perkins

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 29, 2017
327 Conn. 974 (Conn. 2017)

Opinion

11-29-2017

PRESIDENTIAL VILLAGE, LLC v. Tonya PERKINS

Amy Eppler–Epstein, in support of the petition. Hugh D. Hughes, in opposition.


Amy Eppler–Epstein, in support of the petition.

Hugh D. Hughes, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 176 Conn. App. 493, 170 A.3d 701 (2017), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the trial court's holding that a federal pretermination notice for nonpayment of rent must be limited to rent charges that are a permissible basis for such an eviction under Connecticut summary process law?

"2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that state law is not relevant in determining whether the information provided in a federal pretermination notice is so misleading as to render it jurisdictionally defective?


Summaries of

Presidential Vill., LLC v. Perkins

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 29, 2017
327 Conn. 974 (Conn. 2017)
Case details for

Presidential Vill., LLC v. Perkins

Case Details

Full title:PRESIDENTIAL VILLAGE, LLC v. Tonya PERKINS

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Nov 29, 2017

Citations

327 Conn. 974 (Conn. 2017)
174 A.3d 193

Citing Cases

Presidential Vill., LLC v. Perkins

We then granted the defendant's petition for certification to appeal to this court. Although the certified…