From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

President Directors of Manhattan Co. v. Albert

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Oct 21, 1948
193 Misc. 64 (N.Y. App. Term 1948)

Opinion

October 21, 1948.

Appeal from the Municipal court of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, McNULTY, J.

Lloyd B. Kanter for appellant.

Benjamin Harwood, Jr., for respondents.


There is nothing in the Business Rent Law (L. 1945, ch. 314, as amd.) which prohibits a landlord from terminating a monthly tenancy by a proper notice. Here there was lawful notice terminating the letting. The prohibition of the statute is against removal if the tenant pays the rent to which the landlord is entitled. The provisions of section 5, when read with the provisions of section 8 dealing with renewals, make clear that the emergency rent is fair rent which the landlord can ask in the absence of a subsisting agreement for a lower rent.

The final order should be unanimously modified on the law, by directing that the landlord recover the amount demanded in the petition, and as so modified, final order affirmed, with $12.50 costs to the landlord.

MacCRATE, STEINBRINK and FENNELLY, JJ., concur.

Ordered accordingly.


Summaries of

President Directors of Manhattan Co. v. Albert

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Oct 21, 1948
193 Misc. 64 (N.Y. App. Term 1948)
Case details for

President Directors of Manhattan Co. v. Albert

Case Details

Full title:PRESIDENT AND DIRECTORS OF MANHATTAN COMPANY, Landlord, Appellant, v…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Oct 21, 1948

Citations

193 Misc. 64 (N.Y. App. Term 1948)
84 N.Y.S.2d 795