From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prepetit v. U.S.

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Oct 7, 2008
Civil Action No. 94-021 (D.D.C. Oct. 7, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 94-021.

October 7, 2008


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


Before the Court is Ralph John Prepetit's motion for reduction of sentence to run sentences concurrent.

"A district court does not have inherent power to resentence defendants at any time." United States v. Lewis, 862 F.2d 748, 750 (9th Cir. 1988) (quotation omitted), cert. denied,489 U.S. 1032 (1989). The authority to change a sentence must derive from some federal statutory authority, most commonly Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Id. No such authority exists here. It is therefore

ORDERED that the motion is DENIED on the grounds that this Court lacks the authority to amend Prepetit's sentence.


Summaries of

Prepetit v. U.S.

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Oct 7, 2008
Civil Action No. 94-021 (D.D.C. Oct. 7, 2008)
Case details for

Prepetit v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:RALPH JOHN PREPETIT Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Respondent

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Oct 7, 2008

Citations

Civil Action No. 94-021 (D.D.C. Oct. 7, 2008)