From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prentice v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California
May 13, 2013
No. C 12-5856 MEJ (N.D. Cal. May. 13, 2013)

Opinion

No. C 12-5856 MEJ

05-13-2013

NANCY PRENTICE, Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, Defendant.


ORDER RE: MEET & CONFER

PROCEDURE

The Court is in receipt of Plaintiffs' counsel's request, filed May 2, 2013, regarding the in-person meet and confer requirement for discovery disputes in this case. (Dkt. No. 16.) Good cause appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS the parties' request to meet and confer by telephone and/or video conference. So as to ensure compliance with the spirit of the meet and confer requirement, the parties shall make a contemporaneous record of their meetings using a court reporter or electronic recording device. The parties should be mindful that the Court may re-instate the in-person meeting requirement if it determines that the alternative meetings are not fruitful.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________

Maria-Elena James

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Prentice v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California
May 13, 2013
No. C 12-5856 MEJ (N.D. Cal. May. 13, 2013)
Case details for

Prentice v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp.

Case Details

Full title:NANCY PRENTICE, Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California

Date published: May 13, 2013

Citations

No. C 12-5856 MEJ (N.D. Cal. May. 13, 2013)