Prentice v. Haynes

Full title: STEVEN DIXON PRENTICE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DR. GREGORY DELAND HAYNES…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 3, 2023

No. 23-6243 (4th Cir. Oct. 3, 2023)

Opinion

23-6243

10-03-2023

STEVEN DIXON PRENTICE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DR. GREGORY DELAND HAYNES; PHILLIP TOLMAN; DR. CLIFFORD CURTIS; ABHAY AGARWAL; DR. CHARLES A. LEWIS; EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR., Defendants-Appellees, and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY; TERRI CATLETT; GEORGE BAIDEN; LORI A. WISHART, Defendants.

Steven Dixon Prentice, Appellant Pro Se. John David Kocher, SHUMAKER LOOP &KENDRICK, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina; Jeffrey D. Keister, MCANGUS GOUDELOCK &COURIE, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina; Elizabeth Pharr McCullough, WALKER, ALLEN, GRICE, AMMONS, FOY, KLICK &MCCULLOUGH, Raleigh, North Carolina; Jennifer Dotson Maldonado, BATTEN LEE, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina; Jonathan Edgar Hall, PARKER POE ADAMS &BERNSTEIN LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; Bettina Jimille Roberts, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM

UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: September 28, 2023

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:20-ct-03150-D)

Steven Dixon Prentice, Appellant Pro Se.

John David Kocher, SHUMAKER LOOP &KENDRICK, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina; Jeffrey D. Keister, MCANGUS GOUDELOCK &COURIE, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina; Elizabeth Pharr McCullough, WALKER, ALLEN, GRICE, AMMONS, FOY, KLICK &MCCULLOUGH, Raleigh, North Carolina; Jennifer Dotson Maldonado, BATTEN LEE, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina; Jonathan Edgar Hall, PARKER POE ADAMS &BERNSTEIN LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; Bettina Jimille Roberts, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER, THACKER, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM

Steven Dixon Prentice, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the district court's order granting Defendants summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. Prentice v. Haynes, No. 5:20-ct-03150-D (E.D. N.C. Mar. 3, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED