From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prentice v. Dimatteo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 9, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-1605 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 9, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-1605

02-09-2012

ANTHONY PRENTICE, Plaintiff, v. CARLA DIMATTEO, Defendant.


District Judge Nora Barry Fischer


MEMORANDUM ORDER

The above captioned case was initiated by the filing of a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1) on December 19, 2011, and was referred to a united states magistrate judge for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and the local rules of court.

On January 18, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 12) recommending that the Complaint be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Plaintiff filed Objections to the Report and Recommendation on February 6, 2012 (ECF No. 13). Plaintiffs Objections do not undermine the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, and the Objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 9th day of February, 2012;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and it would be futile to allow Plaintiff the opportunity to amend.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF. No. 12) dated January 18, 2012, is ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this case CLOSED.

AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Plaintiff has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

By the Court:

____________

Nora Barry Fischer

United States District Judge
cc: Anthony Prentice 74880

Nevada Department of Corrections

P.O. Box 1989

4569 North State Rt.

Ely, NV 89301


Summaries of

Prentice v. Dimatteo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 9, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-1605 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Prentice v. Dimatteo

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY PRENTICE, Plaintiff, v. CARLA DIMATTEO, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Feb 9, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-1605 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 9, 2012)