From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prendergast v. Prendergast

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 27, 1995
212 A.D.2d 764 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

February 27, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County.


Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The appeal from the judgment must be dismissed because a party may not appeal from an order or judgment entered upon a stipulation (see, Hagfors v. Hagfors, 200 A.D.2d 873, 874; Kalra v. Kalra, 170 A.D.2d 579; Hopkins v. Hopkins, 97 A.D.2d 457). The defendant's proper remedy concerning the propriety of the parties' settlement agreement is a motion in the Supreme Court to set aside the stipulation (see, Hagfors v. Hagfors, supra; Hopkins v. Hopkins, supra). Pizzuto, J.P., Santucci, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Prendergast v. Prendergast

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 27, 1995
212 A.D.2d 764 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Prendergast v. Prendergast

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS F. PRENDERGAST, Respondent, v. DEBRA W. PRENDERGAST, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 27, 1995

Citations

212 A.D.2d 764 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
624 N.Y.S.2d 852