From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Preiss v. BNSF Ry. Co.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Dec 19, 2023
2:23-cv-01476-TL (W.D. Wash. Dec. 19, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-01476-TL

12-19-2023

CHRISTOPHER PREISS, Plaintiff, v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant.


MINUTE ORDER

The following Minute Order is made at the direction of the Court, the Honorable Tana Lin, United States District Judge:

(1) On December 15, 2023, Plaintiff filed a Stipulated Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint. Dkt. No. 11. The purportedly stipulated motion is signed only by Plaintiff's counsel and seeks Court action expressly granting leave to amend.

(2) Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2), the Court's leave in not required if Defendant consents in writing to Plaintiff's proposed amendments. Thus, it is unclear if Plaintiff is seeking leave to amend without Defendant's written consent, and if so, how such a request may be qualified as stipulated. The Court therefore STRIKES the deficient stipulated motion without prejudice.

(3) If Plaintiff has conferred with Defendant and received written consent to amend the complaint, Plaintiff may file proof of the written consent and amend without the Court's leave. If Defendant is unwilling to provide written consent to file the proposed amended complaint, Plaintiff may refile an appropriately noted opposed motion for leave to amend.


Summaries of

Preiss v. BNSF Ry. Co.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Dec 19, 2023
2:23-cv-01476-TL (W.D. Wash. Dec. 19, 2023)
Case details for

Preiss v. BNSF Ry. Co.

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER PREISS, Plaintiff, v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Dec 19, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-01476-TL (W.D. Wash. Dec. 19, 2023)