From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Preciado v. Warden

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 21, 2024
CV 24-02663-DSF (DFM) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 21, 2024)

Opinion

CV 24-02663-DSF (DFM)

11-21-2024

JULIO ESPINOZA PRECIADO, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DALE S. FISCHER, United States District Judge.

Under 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections were filed. The Court accepts the report, findings, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss is granted and that Judgment be entered denying the Petition without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and mootness.


Summaries of

Preciado v. Warden

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 21, 2024
CV 24-02663-DSF (DFM) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 21, 2024)
Case details for

Preciado v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:JULIO ESPINOZA PRECIADO, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Nov 21, 2024

Citations

CV 24-02663-DSF (DFM) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 21, 2024)