Opinion
2:20-cv-01360-JAD-VCF
04-05-2022
PRB SUPPLY LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. PALE HORSE GRS L.L.P., a Tennessee limited liability partnership; CHRIS CLARK, an individual; and AARON SPRADLIN, an individual, Defendants.
Cami M. Perkins, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 9149 Jonathan W. Fountain, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 10351 Steven E. Kish, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 15257 HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PLLC Attorney for Defendants Pale Horse GRS, LLP, Chris Clark, and Aaron Spradlin HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PLLC, Cami M. Perkins, Esq., Jonathan W. Fountain, Esq. Attorneys for Defendants Pale Horse GRS, LLP, Chris Clark, and Aaron Spradlin RICE REUTHER SULLIVAN & CARROLL, LLP David A. Carroll, Esq. Anthony J. DiRaimondo, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff PRB Supply LLC
Cami M. Perkins, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 9149 Jonathan W. Fountain, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 10351 Steven E. Kish, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 15257 HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PLLC Attorney for Defendants Pale Horse GRS, LLP, Chris Clark, and Aaron Spradlin
HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PLLC, Cami M. Perkins, Esq., Jonathan W. Fountain, Esq. Attorneys for Defendants Pale Horse GRS, LLP, Chris Clark, and Aaron Spradlin
RICE REUTHER SULLIVAN & CARROLL, LLP David A. Carroll, Esq. Anthony J. DiRaimondo, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff PRB Supply LLC
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO COMPLY WITH ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL
Pursuant to Local Rules LR IA 6-2 and LR 7-1, Defendants, Pale Horse GRS, LLC, Chris Clark, and Aaron Spradlin (“Defendants”), and Plaintiff, PRB Supply, LLC (“Plaintiff') hereby submit this stipulation and proposed order as follows:
1. Defendants were ordered to comply with the Court's Order granting Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Production of Unredacted Financial Information (the “Motion”), filed on January 18, 2022, by April 12, 2022. (See Minutes of Proceedings, ECF No. 71.)
2. Additional time to comply with the Motion is necessary because Defendants recently retained new counsel who requires more time in order to ensure full compliance. Defendants and their new counsel need to adequately review and understand the complexities of the case to comply with the order of the Court.
3. The parties and their respective counsel have consulted and agreed that additional time to comply with the Court's Order is appropriate under these circumstances. This time will better enable counsel to confer with the Defendants and prepare the documents ordered to be produced.
4. Based upon the foregoing and for good cause shown, Defendants shall have additional time, through and including, April 22, 2022, to comply with the Court's Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.