From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pratt v. Villa Roma Country Club

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 13, 2000
277 A.D.2d 298 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted October 18, 2000.

November 13, 2000.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated October 14, 1999, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Alan W. Clark Associates, LLC, Levittown, N.Y. (Deborah S. Kurtz of counsel), for appellants.

Greenfield Hastings, Jericho, N.Y. (Michael T. Reilly of counsel), for respondent.

Before: CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., THOMAS R. SULLIVAN, GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant, Villa Roma Country Club, Inc., demonstrated its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see, Minott v. City of New York, 230 A.D.2d 719). It is uncontroverted that the injured plaintiff' s fall occurred on property owned and maintained by the third-party defendant, Town of Delaware (hereinafter the Town). As an abutting landowner, the defendant could be liable only if it created the defective condition or caused the defect to occur because of some special use, or if "a local ordinance or statute specifically charges [the] landowner with a duty to maintain and repair the sidewalks and imposes liability for injuries resulting from the breach of that duty" (Hausser v. Giunta, 88 N.Y.2d 449, 453; accord, Elias v. City of New York, 258 A.D.2d 435). No ordinance or statute is alleged here. Thus, it was incumbent upon the plaintiffs to raise a triable issue of fact that the defendant either created or caused the defective condition, or derived a special benefit from the abutting property unrelated to the public use, and was therefore required to maintain a portion of that property (see, Poirier v. City of Schenectady, 85 N.Y.2d 310, 315; Thomas v. Triangle Realty Co., 255 A.D.2d 153). Since the plaintiffs failed to come forward with any opposing evidence demonstrating that the defendant created or caused the defective condition, or made a special use of that portion of the Town's property on which the injured plaintiff fell, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.


Summaries of

Pratt v. Villa Roma Country Club

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 13, 2000
277 A.D.2d 298 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Pratt v. Villa Roma Country Club

Case Details

Full title:MARIE PRATT, ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. VILLA ROMA COUNTRY CLUB, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 13, 2000

Citations

277 A.D.2d 298 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
716 N.Y.S.2d 81

Citing Cases

Wilkerson v. City of N.Y.

Since there has been no allegation in the complaint or bill of particulars that the condition was located in…

Sotell v. City of N.Y.

The only other bases for liability against Flushing and partnership would be under common law negligence if…