From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pratt v. United States

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 12, 2021
1:19-cv-01465-DAD-SKO (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 12, 2021)

Opinion

1:19-cv-01465-DAD-SKO (PC)

08-12-2021

BYRON PRATT, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

SHEILA K. OBERTO, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

On June 21, 2021, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 24.) Pursuant to Local Rule 230(1), and as explained in the motion (id. at 2), Plaintiff had 21 days to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition. To date, Plaintiff has failed to do so.

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff, within 21 days , to show cause in writing why this action should not be dismissed for his failure to prosecute. Alternatively, within that same time, Plaintiff may file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendant's motion for summary judgment. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pratt v. United States

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 12, 2021
1:19-cv-01465-DAD-SKO (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 12, 2021)
Case details for

Pratt v. United States

Case Details

Full title:BYRON PRATT, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 12, 2021

Citations

1:19-cv-01465-DAD-SKO (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 12, 2021)