From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PRATT v. KRAK

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 26, 2005
Civil Action No. 04-965, In Re: Doc. 12 (W.D. Pa. Oct. 26, 2005)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 04-965, In Re: Doc. 12.

October 26, 2005


MEMORANDUM ORDER


The Plaintiff's complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on June 29, 2004, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Francis X. Caiazza for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation, filed on September 29, 2005, recommended that the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the Defendants (Doc. 12) be granted. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on the Plaintiff by First Class United States Mail and on the Defendants. No objections have been filed. After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation and the objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 26th day of October, 2005,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the Defendants (Doc. 12) is granted.

The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Caiazza, dated September 29, 2005, is adopted as the opinion of the court.


Summaries of

PRATT v. KRAK

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 26, 2005
Civil Action No. 04-965, In Re: Doc. 12 (W.D. Pa. Oct. 26, 2005)
Case details for

PRATT v. KRAK

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY PRATT, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT KRAK, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 26, 2005

Citations

Civil Action No. 04-965, In Re: Doc. 12 (W.D. Pa. Oct. 26, 2005)