From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prater v. Sahota

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 6, 2011
No. CIV S-06-1993 KJM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 6, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-1993 KJM GGH P.

April 6, 2011


ORDER


On March 8, 2011, the court issued a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum for plaintiff's appearance by videoconferencing at a trial confirmation hearing set for April 27, 2011. Counsel for defendant has now notified the court that the videoconferencing equipment at the prison will not be available on that day and seeks a modification.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

1. Defendant's motion to modify the order compelling plaintiff's appearance by videoconferencing (ECF Nos. 106) is granted;

2. Plaintiff is to appear in person at the trial confirmation set for April 27, 2011 at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom Three; an amended writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum accompanies this order;

3. The parties should be prepared to exchange the exhibits identified in the pretrial order at the trial confirmation hearing; and

4. In addition, the parties should be prepared to address the progress of any further settlement negotiations.

DATED: April 5, 2011


Summaries of

Prater v. Sahota

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 6, 2011
No. CIV S-06-1993 KJM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 6, 2011)
Case details for

Prater v. Sahota

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER KYLE PRATER, Plaintiff, v. P. SAHOTA, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 6, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-06-1993 KJM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 6, 2011)