From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prater v. Oliver

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 10, 2009
No. CIV S-06-1993 FCD GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-1993 FCD GGH P.

August 10, 2009


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On June 10, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 10, 2009, are adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff's January 5, 2009 (#48) deficient motion for summary judgment is denied.


Summaries of

Prater v. Oliver

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 10, 2009
No. CIV S-06-1993 FCD GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2009)
Case details for

Prater v. Oliver

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER KYLE PRATER, Plaintiff, v. MTA OLIVER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 10, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-06-1993 FCD GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2009)