From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prasad v. Foxmore Process Servers

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jul 24, 2018
No. 18-6576 (4th Cir. Jul. 24, 2018)

Opinion

No. 18-6576

07-24-2018

SUNDARI K. PRASAD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. FOXMORE PROCESS SERVERS; MICHAEL FOXMORE, Owner of Foxmore Servers, Defendants - Appellees.

Sundari K. Prasad, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge. (3:17-cv-00041-MHL-RCY) Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sundari K. Prasad, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Sundari K. Prasad appeals the district court's order dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B), 1915A(b)(1) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Prasad v. Foxmore Process Servers, No. 3:17-cv-00041-MHL-RCY (E.D. Va. May 9, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Prasad v. Foxmore Process Servers

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jul 24, 2018
No. 18-6576 (4th Cir. Jul. 24, 2018)
Case details for

Prasad v. Foxmore Process Servers

Case Details

Full title:SUNDARI K. PRASAD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. FOXMORE PROCESS SERVERS…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jul 24, 2018

Citations

No. 18-6576 (4th Cir. Jul. 24, 2018)