Opinion
No. 18-6576
07-24-2018
Sundari K. Prasad, Appellant Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge. (3:17-cv-00041-MHL-RCY) Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sundari K. Prasad, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Sundari K. Prasad appeals the district court's order dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B), 1915A(b)(1) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Prasad v. Foxmore Process Servers, No. 3:17-cv-00041-MHL-RCY (E.D. Va. May 9, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED