From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prasad v. Rolfe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Sep 6, 2017
Civil Action No. 3:17CV64 (E.D. Va. Sep. 6, 2017)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:17CV64

09-06-2017

SUNDARI K. PRASAD, Plaintiff, v. MELINDA ROLFE, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

By Memorandum Order entered on July 20, 2017, the Court directed Plaintiff to file a particularized complaint within fourteen (14) days of the date of entry thereof. Because Plaintiff failed to submit a particularized complaint or otherwise respond to the July 20, 2017 Memorandum Order, by Memorandum Opinion and Order entered on August 23, 2017, the Court dismissed the action. However, later that same day, the Court received Plaintiff's tardy Particularized Complaint. Because the Particularized Complaint was received the same day as the Court dismissed the action, the August 23, 2017 Memorandum Opinion and Order will be VACATED. The Court will continue to process the action.

An appropriate order will accompany this Memorandum Opinion.

/s/_________

M. Hannah Lauck

United States District Judge Date: SEP 06 2017
Richmond, Virginia


Summaries of

Prasad v. Rolfe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Sep 6, 2017
Civil Action No. 3:17CV64 (E.D. Va. Sep. 6, 2017)
Case details for

Prasad v. Rolfe

Case Details

Full title:SUNDARI K. PRASAD, Plaintiff, v. MELINDA ROLFE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

Date published: Sep 6, 2017

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:17CV64 (E.D. Va. Sep. 6, 2017)