From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prasad v. Office of Pers. Mgmt.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 15, 2017
2016-2267 (Fed. Cir. May. 15, 2017)

Opinion

2016-2267

05-15-2017

CHANNAVJJALA M. PRASAD, Petitioner v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent

E. JOHN STEREN, Epstein Becker & Green, P.C., Washington, DC, argued for petitioner. MICHAEL ANTHONY RODRIGUEZ, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by BENJAMIN C. MIZER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., ALLISON KIDD-MILLER.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. DC-0831-14-1114-I-2.

JUDGMENT

E. JOHN STEREN, Epstein Becker & Green, P.C., Washington, DC, argued for petitioner. MICHAEL ANTHONY RODRIGUEZ, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by BENJAMIN C. MIZER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., ALLISON KIDD-MILLER. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, CLEVENGER, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT May 15, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Prasad v. Office of Pers. Mgmt.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 15, 2017
2016-2267 (Fed. Cir. May. 15, 2017)
Case details for

Prasad v. Office of Pers. Mgmt.

Case Details

Full title:CHANNAVJJALA M. PRASAD, Petitioner v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: May 15, 2017

Citations

2016-2267 (Fed. Cir. May. 15, 2017)