From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prasad v. Attorney General of State

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 12, 2008
No. CIV S-07-1761-LKK-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 12, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-1761-LKK-CMK-P.

February 12, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules.

On December 3, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within 20 days. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 3, 2007, are adopted in full;

2. This action is dismissed for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file.


Summaries of

Prasad v. Attorney General of State

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 12, 2008
No. CIV S-07-1761-LKK-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 12, 2008)
Case details for

Prasad v. Attorney General of State

Case Details

Full title:NELESH PRASAD, Petitioner, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 12, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-07-1761-LKK-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 12, 2008)