From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pramuk v. Hiestand

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
Sep 14, 2016
CAUSE NO. 3:16-CV-572 (N.D. Ind. Sep. 14, 2016)

Opinion

CAUSE NO. 3:16-CV-572

09-14-2016

SUSAN E. PRAMUK, Plaintiff, v. TERRY HIESTAND, PATRICK PRAMUK, CHERYL L. MONTALBANO RAHMANY, THE FOOD PANTRY, PORTER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, TILTON & TILTON Defendants.


OPINION AND ORDER

On August 26, 2016, Susan E. Pramuk filed a complaint against various defendants in this Court but failed to pay the filing fee or seek leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. Pramuk may not proceed with her complaint unless she files the $400 fee, see 28 U.S.C. § 1914 and the District Court Miscellaneous Fee Schedule, or is excused by the Court from paying such fee as set out in 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

Mindful of her pro se status, the Court grants Ms. Pramuk until October 14, 2016, to either pay the filing fee or to petition the Court to proceed without the prepayment of such fee. Failure to abide by this order will result in dismissal of this case without further notice. The CLERK is DIRECTED to mail, along with this Order, the court's pre-printed form to request in forma pauperis status. SO ORDERED. This 14th day of September, 2016.

s/ William C. Lee

United States District Court


Summaries of

Pramuk v. Hiestand

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
Sep 14, 2016
CAUSE NO. 3:16-CV-572 (N.D. Ind. Sep. 14, 2016)
Case details for

Pramuk v. Hiestand

Case Details

Full title:SUSAN E. PRAMUK, Plaintiff, v. TERRY HIESTAND, PATRICK PRAMUK, CHERYL L…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

Date published: Sep 14, 2016

Citations

CAUSE NO. 3:16-CV-572 (N.D. Ind. Sep. 14, 2016)