holding that where a plan does not define the "proof" or "documentation" sufficient to establish disability, it was not unreasonable for MetLife to interpret the plan to require objective evidence
Summary of this case from Santana-Díaz v. Metro. Life Ins. Co.No. 06-135.
October 2, 2006.
Certiorari Denied.
C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
holding that where a plan does not define the "proof" or "documentation" sufficient to establish disability, it was not unreasonable for MetLife to interpret the plan to require objective evidence
Summary of this case from Santana-Díaz v. Metro. Life Ins. Co.Full title:PRALUTSKY v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE Co
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 2, 2006
However, numerous Courts have concluded that an administrator does not abuse its discretion by requiring…
Santana-Díaz v. Metro. Life Ins. Co.A plan administrator is entitled to define ambiguous terms regarding proof of disability so long as its…