From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prakash v. Pulsent Corporation

United States District Court, N.D. California
Feb 12, 2009
No. C06-7592 SC (BZ) (N.D. Cal. Feb. 12, 2009)

Opinion

No. C06-7592 SC (BZ).

February 12, 2009


BRIEFING ORDER


Judge Conti has referred Sun Life's motion to compel the Prakashs to produce documents and order for Verseon to produce documents and the order for Verseon to show cause why it should not be held in contempt to me. Because trial is imminent, IT IS ORDERED that the opposition to each motion shall be filed by February 20, 2009. Any reply shall be filed by February 25, 2009. The motions will be heard on March 4, 2009 at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom G, 15th Floor, Federal Building, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California 94102.


Summaries of

Prakash v. Pulsent Corporation

United States District Court, N.D. California
Feb 12, 2009
No. C06-7592 SC (BZ) (N.D. Cal. Feb. 12, 2009)
Case details for

Prakash v. Pulsent Corporation

Case Details

Full title:ENIKO PRAKASH, Plaintiff(s), v. PULSENT CORPORATION, Defendant(s)

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Feb 12, 2009

Citations

No. C06-7592 SC (BZ) (N.D. Cal. Feb. 12, 2009)