From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prager v. Borden's Condensed Milk Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Feb 1, 1901
34 Misc. 193 (N.Y. App. Term 1901)

Opinion

February, 1901.

Joseph L. Prager, for appellant.

Thomas M. Rowlette, for respondent.


A justice of the Municipal Court has no power to grant a new trial upon the ground of newly-discovered evidence. De Lemos v. Cohen, 28 Misc. 579. It was, therefore, improper to open the case for the purpose assigned, and the judgment appealed from must be reversed. The defendant, however, was seriously prejudiced by being required to proceed to trial, originally, before the plaintiff furnished the bill of particulars ordered by the court; and, after a consideration of the entire record, we are of the opinion that the ends of justice will be promoted by a new trial.

Judgment appealed from reversed and new trial ordered, without costs to either party.

ANDREWS, P.J., and BLANCHARD, J., concur.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, without costs.


Summaries of

Prager v. Borden's Condensed Milk Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Feb 1, 1901
34 Misc. 193 (N.Y. App. Term 1901)
Case details for

Prager v. Borden's Condensed Milk Co.

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS S. PRAGER, Appellant, v . THE BORDEN'S CONDENSED MILK CO., Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Feb 1, 1901

Citations

34 Misc. 193 (N.Y. App. Term 1901)
68 N.Y.S. 833

Citing Cases

Erichson v. Sidlo

It is provided by the statute cited that a motion to "vacate or modify any judgment rendered upon a trial by…