From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prado v. Mazeika

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 5, 2019
Case No. 3:16-cv-320 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 5, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 3:16-cv-320

03-05-2019

GLENDA JACQUELINE PRADO, Plaintiff, v. PAT MAZEIKA, et al., Defendants.


DECISION AND ENTRY TENTATIVELY SUSTAINING WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEFENDANTS' MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING EXHIBITS NOT PREVIOUSLY PRODUCED (DOC. #88)

Defendants, Greene County, Ohio, Board of Commissioners and Greene County, Ohio (collectively referred to as "Greene County"), have filed a motion in limine regarding certain exhibits not previously produced in discovery by Plaintiff, Glenda Jacqueline Prado ("Prado"). These exhibits, which are listed in Greene County's motion, were allegedly recently disclosed by Prado at the time of the parties' Joint Pretrial Statement. Doc. #88, PAGEID##1104-1105.

The Court, having reviewed Greene County's motion, tentatively SUSTAINS same without prejudice to further review and consideration by Magistrate Judge Ovington prior to the start of trial on March 11, 2019. Date: March 5, 2019

/s/_________

WALTER H. RICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Prado v. Mazeika

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 5, 2019
Case No. 3:16-cv-320 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 5, 2019)
Case details for

Prado v. Mazeika

Case Details

Full title:GLENDA JACQUELINE PRADO, Plaintiff, v. PAT MAZEIKA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 5, 2019

Citations

Case No. 3:16-cv-320 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 5, 2019)