From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pradas v. Pradas

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 1, 1990
561 So. 2d 6 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 90-680.

May 1, 1990.

Petition for review from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Amy Steele Donner, J.

Laurence D. Faye, Coral Gables, for appellant.

Nathaniel Barone, Jr., Coral Gables, for appellee.

Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and GERSTEN, JJ.


Julio Armando Pradas petitions this court for a writ of certiorari to review an order of the trial court finding him in contempt for failing to make support payments to his former wife. The order is appealable as a non-final order after final order pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.130(a)(4); we treat the petition as a timely filed notice of appeal, Thomson, Bohrer, Werth Razook v. Multi Restaurant Concepts, Inc., 561 So.2d 1192 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), and brief of appellant. Upon consideration of the brief, response, and reply, we reverse and remand.

An order of contempt for failure to pay support must contain specific findings that either "(1) the petitioner presently has the ability to comply with the order and willfully refuses to do so, or (2) that the petitioner previously had the ability to comply, but divested himself of that ability through his fault or neglect designed to frustrate the intent and purpose of the order." Faircloth v. Faircloth, 339 So.2d 650, 651 (Fla. 1976), receded from on other grounds sub nom., Bowen v. Bowen, 471 So.2d 1274 (Fla. 1985); Hernandez v. Hernandez, 478 So.2d 458 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Acosta v. Acosta, 409 So.2d 196 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). Because the trial court failed to set forth specific findings, we hold that the order of contempt is fatally defective.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Pradas v. Pradas

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 1, 1990
561 So. 2d 6 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Pradas v. Pradas

Case Details

Full title:JULIO PRADAS, APPELLANT, v. ANGELA PRADAS, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: May 1, 1990

Citations

561 So. 2d 6 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Walden v. Adekola

We reach that conclusion because in Commonwealth Federal, the Florida Supreme Court found dismissal of an…

Lubin v. Schumer

Second, the trial court ordered Lubin to serve thirty days in jail if he failed to reimburse Schumer for…