From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Poynter v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO
Mar 31, 1998
964 S.W.2d 246 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 72646

OPINION FILED: March 31, 1998

Appeal for the Circuit Court, Warren County; Edward D. Hodge.

Deborah B. Wafer, Asst. Public Defender, Susan McGraugh, St. Louis, for movant/appellant.

John Munson Morris, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., Cristi A. Ingalsbe, Jefferson City, for defendant/respondent.

Before CRANE, P.J., and RHODES RUSSELL and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.



ORDER

William Poynter, movant, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal and find the motion court's judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Poynter v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO
Mar 31, 1998
964 S.W.2d 246 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Poynter v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM POYNTER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO

Date published: Mar 31, 1998

Citations

964 S.W.2d 246 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)