From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Powers v. Theofel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1929
226 App. Div. 696 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)

Opinion

March, 1929.


Order reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. In our opinion the action may be maintained. ( Brown v. Cole, 54 Misc. 278; Cummings v. Bailey, 53 id. 142; affd., 120 App. Div. 892. ) The record shows that the amended rules of the Democratic county committee of Queens county were not adopted by a majority of that committee as required by section 15 of the Election Law. They are, therefore, invalid and their enforcement may be enjoined. Lazansky, P.J., Rich, Young, Kapper and Seeger, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Powers v. Theofel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1929
226 App. Div. 696 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)
Case details for

Powers v. Theofel

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH P. POWERS, Appellant, v. JOHN THEOFEL, DOROTHY A. JULIG and PETER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1929

Citations

226 App. Div. 696 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)

Citing Cases

Theofel v. Butler

It is also provided that "the executive committee shall elect its own chairman and such other officers as it…

De Camilla v. Connery

In the absence of rules adopted by a political organization, such organization is governed by the common-law…