From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Powers v. Layton

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Oct 11, 2022
21-cv-06382-AGT (N.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2022)

Opinion

21-cv-06382-AGT

10-11-2022

TAMMY S POWERS, Plaintiff, v. SEAN LAYTON, et al., Defendants.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S CASE

ALEX G. TSE United States Magistrate Judge.

The undersigned previously screened Tammy Powers's complaint under the in forma pauperis statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e); concluded that the complaint was deficient; and gave Powers leave to amend to correct the identified deficiencies by no later than September 18, 2022. See Dkt. 13. Powers was advised that if “she does not file an amended complaint by [September 18], or if her amended complaint is still deficient, the undersigned will recommend that a district judge dismiss this case.” Id. at 5. To date, no amended complaint has been filed.

Powers declined to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction, see Dkt. 7, so the undersigned (i) requests that the Clerk of the Court reassign Powers's case to a district judge and (ii) recommends that the district judge dismiss the case without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Powers may object to this recommendation within 14 days after being served with a copy. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Powers v. Layton

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Oct 11, 2022
21-cv-06382-AGT (N.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2022)
Case details for

Powers v. Layton

Case Details

Full title:TAMMY S POWERS, Plaintiff, v. SEAN LAYTON, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Oct 11, 2022

Citations

21-cv-06382-AGT (N.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2022)