From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor Int'l, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 6, 2011
NO. C 09-05235 JW (N.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2011)

Opinion

NO. C 09-05235 JW

10-06-2011

Power Integrations, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Fairchild Semiconductor Int'l, Inc. et al., Defendants.


ORDER SETTING BRIEFING ON ADDITIONAL CLAIM CONSTRUCTION

On September 14, 2011, the Court ordered the parties to submit supplemental briefs on the question of whether the Court should construe additional terms identified by the parties as being disputed. Defendants submitted briefing contending that the Court should construe the phrases "to switch the power switch" and "current limit" on the grounds that these terms might be dispositive as to questions of patent validity or infringement. Plaintiff contends that even if the Court were to adopt the claim constructions offered by Defendants, this would not be dispositive of either invalidity or infringement. Plaintiff accordingly asks that the case be set for trial. (Id.)

(Order Vacating Case Management Conference; Setting Briefing Schedule, hereafter, "Order," Docket Item No. 134.)

(Defendants' Brief in Support of Supplemental Claim Construction, hereafter, "Defendants' Brief," Docket Item No. 135.)

(Power Integrations' Brief re. No Need for Further Claim Construction at 4, hereafter, "Plaintiff's Brief," Docket Item No. 137.)
--------

The Patent Local Rules provide that parties shall prepare for claim construction by "jointly identify[ing] the 10 terms likely to be most significant to resolving the parties' dispute, including those terms for which construction may be case or claim dispositive." Patent L.R. 4-1(b).

Upon review, the Court finds good cause to construe the additional terms because they may be dispositive in resolving the claims. On or before October 13, 2011, the parties shall file simultaneous claim construction briefs of no more than ten pages on the two terms. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, the matter will be taken under submission for decision without oral argument.

On November 21, 2011 at 10 a.m. the parties shall appear for a Case Management Conference. On or before October 28, 2011, the parties shall submit a Joint Case Management Statement. The Statement shall include, among other things, the parties' proposed schedule on how this case should proceed and an update on the parties' settlement efforts.

JAMES WARE

United States District Chief Judge

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO:

Anthony R. de Alcuaz adealcuaz@mwe.com

Frank Everett Scherkenbach scherkenbach@fr.com

Howard Glenn Pollack pollack@fr.com

Jeremiah Aaron Armstrong jarmstrong@mwe.com

Jeremy Todd Elman jelman@mwe.com

Jeremy Todd Elman jelman@mwe.com

Michael Richard Headley headley@fr.com

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

JW Chambers

Susan Imbriani

Courtroom Deputy


Summaries of

Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor Int'l, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 6, 2011
NO. C 09-05235 JW (N.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2011)
Case details for

Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor Int'l, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Power Integrations, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Fairchild Semiconductor Int'l…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 6, 2011

Citations

NO. C 09-05235 JW (N.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2011)