From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Powell v. Union Pac. R.R. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 13, 2011
NO. CIV. S-09-1857 KJM-EFB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 13, 2011)

Opinion

NO. CIV. S-09-1857 KJM-EFB

08-13-2011

ROBERT L. POWELL, Plaintiff, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

On June 28, 2011 the court ordered the parties to submit a joint statement of undisputed facts no later than August 3, 2011. ECF 86. The parties failed to do so; instead, each party submitted a declaration blaming the other side for the delay. ECF 109; ECF 110; ECF 111. The court extended the deadline for the joint statement of undisputed facts to August 10, 2011. ECF 112. In doing so, the court clarified that simply recounting immaterial facts is not sufficient and that the parties were required to meet and confer and that the "joint statement shall incorporate a representation that the parties have meaningfully met and conferred, with a description of the meet and confer efforts." ECF 112. On August 10, 2011, the parties submitted a list of fourteen facts that are undisputed without any reference to the required meet and confer. ECF 113. As such, the clerk is directed to STRIKE the joint statement of facts for failure to comply with this court's order. The deadline for a joint statement fully complying with this court's August 4th order is reset to August 24, 2011.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Powell v. Union Pac. R.R. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 13, 2011
NO. CIV. S-09-1857 KJM-EFB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 13, 2011)
Case details for

Powell v. Union Pac. R.R. Co.

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT L. POWELL, Plaintiff, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 13, 2011

Citations

NO. CIV. S-09-1857 KJM-EFB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 13, 2011)