From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Powell v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Apr 14, 1932
141 So. 260 (Ala. 1932)

Opinion

8 Div. 398.

April 14, 1932.

Taylor, Richardson Sparkman and Robt. W. Milner, all of Huntsville, for petitioner.

Thos. E. Knight, Jr., Atty. Gen., opposed.


The Court of Appeals, in its opinion which is before us, has applied the doctrine of error without injury to all matters now pressed upon our attention by petitioner for the writ of certiorari. The opinion of that court does not set forth a "statement of the facts or condition of the record," which would furnish this court a basis for a review of the questions presented by the petition. In this state of the case, the writ must be denied. Campbell v. State, 216 Ala. 295, 112 So. 902; Ex parte Steverson, 211 Ala. 597, 100 So. 912; Postal Tel.-Cable Co. v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420, 71 So. 91; Kirkwood v. State, 184 Ala. 9, 63 So. 990; Ex parte Western Union Tel. Co., 183 Ala. 451, 63 So. 88; Trawick v. State, 217 Ala. 149, 115 So. 79; Parham v. State, 217 Ala. 399, 116 So. 418.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and BROWN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Powell v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Apr 14, 1932
141 So. 260 (Ala. 1932)
Case details for

Powell v. State

Case Details

Full title:POWELL v. STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Apr 14, 1932

Citations

141 So. 260 (Ala. 1932)
224 Ala. 584

Citing Cases

Powell v. State

Affirmed. Certiorari denied by Supreme Court in Powell v. State, 224 Ala. 584, 141 So. 260. Taylor,…

McMullian v. State

This court has repeatedly and consistently refused to review on certiorari the application of the harmless…