From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Powell v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Apr 17, 2001
43 S.W.3d 454 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. ED77779

Filed: April 17, 2001

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, HONORABLE GARY P. KRAMER

Mary S. Choi, 1221 Locust St., Suite 350, St. Louis, MO 63103, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. Nixon, P.O. Box 899, Evan J. Buchheim, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before Clifford H. Ahrens, P.J., William H. Crandall Jr., J., and James R. Dowd, J.



ORDER


Appellant, Mark Powell ("Movant"), appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Powell v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Apr 17, 2001
43 S.W.3d 454 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Powell v. State

Case Details

Full title:MARK POWELL, Appellant/Movant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two

Date published: Apr 17, 2001

Citations

43 S.W.3d 454 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)