From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Powell v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Feb 13, 2001
36 S.W.3d 806 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. ED 77957

February 13, 2001

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, HON. WILLIAM CORRIGAN.

Douglas R. Hoff, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Stephanie Morrell, Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, for respondent.

Before: Clifford H. Ahrens, P.J., William H. Crandall Jr., J., and James R. Dowd, J.



ORDER


Appellant, Larry Powell, was convicted of second degree assault and sentenced to seven years imprisonment. This court affirmed his conviction. Powell v. State, 996 S.W.2d 94 (Mo.App.E.D. 1999). Powell now appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without a hearing. Powell alleges that he was denied his right to effective assistance of counsel in that his trial attorney failed to secure civilian pants and shoes for him to wear at trial and did not cross-examine a witness about the condition of her teeth prior to his assault on her.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court's decision was not clearly erroneous in that the clothing Powell wore at trial bore no marks of being prison issue and Powell himself testified to facts sufficient to establish that he inflicted serious physical injury on his victim. As an extended opinion reciting the facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would have no precedential value, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Powell v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Feb 13, 2001
36 S.W.3d 806 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Powell v. State

Case Details

Full title:LARRY POWELL, Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two

Date published: Feb 13, 2001

Citations

36 S.W.3d 806 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)