From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Powell v. Rozum

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 16, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-364 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 16, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-364

04-16-2013

STEVEN POWELL v. ROZUM, et al.


ORDER

AND NOW, this 16th day of April, 2013, upon careful and independent consideration of plaintiff Steven Powell's pro se petition for habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (docket entry # 1) and the Honorable David R. Strawbridge's report and recommendation (docket entry # 4), to which Powell has not filed an objection within the period specified by Loc. R. Civ. P. 72.1 IV (b), and the Court agreeing with Judge Strawbridge that the petition is untimely under § 2254(d) and that Powell has not provided any basis for equitable tolling, despite an order Judge Strawbridge issued inviting Powell to set forth any arguments that would support such tolling, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Judge Strawbridge's report and recommendation (docket entry # 4) is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. Powell's petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (docket entry # 1) is DENIED;

3. A certificate of appealability SHALL NOT issue, as Powell has not demonstrated that reasonable jurists would debate the correctness of this ruling; and

4. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case statistically.

BY THE COURT:

Stewart Dalzell , J.


Summaries of

Powell v. Rozum

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 16, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-364 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 16, 2013)
Case details for

Powell v. Rozum

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN POWELL v. ROZUM, et al.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Apr 16, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-364 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 16, 2013)