From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Powell v. Railey

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Albany Division
Jul 20, 2010
CASE NO.: 1:09-CV-140 (WLS) (M.D. Ga. Jul. 20, 2010)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 1:09-CV-140 (WLS).

July 20, 2010


ORDER


Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff, filed June 22, 2010. (Doc. 12). It is recommended that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss Petition as Untimely and/or for Lack of Exhaustion (Doc. 7) be granted. (Doc. 12 at 2). The Report and Recommendation provided Petitioner with fourteen (14) days to serve and file written objections to the recommendations therein with this Court. ( Id.). The period for objections has expired, and no objections have been filed to date. ( See Docket).

Upon full review and consideration upon the record, the Court finds that said Report and Recommendation (Doc. 12) should be, and hereby is, ACCEPTED, ADOPTED and made the Order of this Court for reason of the findings made and reasons stated therein. Accordingly, Respondent's Motion to Dismiss Petition as Untimely and/or for Lack of Exhaustion (Doc. 7) is GRANTED, and consequently Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 2) is DISMISSED. SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Powell v. Railey

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Albany Division
Jul 20, 2010
CASE NO.: 1:09-CV-140 (WLS) (M.D. Ga. Jul. 20, 2010)
Case details for

Powell v. Railey

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL J. POWELL, Petitioner, v. CHRISTOPHER RAILEY, Superintendent…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Albany Division

Date published: Jul 20, 2010

Citations

CASE NO.: 1:09-CV-140 (WLS) (M.D. Ga. Jul. 20, 2010)