From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Powell v. N.B.M.E

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Apr 7, 2004
511 F.3d 238 (2d Cir. 2004)

Opinion

No. 02-9385.

Argued October 7, 2003.

Decided April 7, 2004. Errata Filed September 16, 2004.

Aaron David Frishberg, Esq., Law Office of Aaron D. Frishberg, Esq., New York, NY, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Sarah Moore Fass, Esq., Day, Berry Howard, Stamford, CT, Albert Zakarian, Esq., Day, Berry Howard Cityplace I, Hartford, CT, Jane D. Comerford, Esq., University of Conn. Health Center, Assistant Attorney General, Farmington, CT, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before WALKER, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, and CARDAMONE, Circuit Judges.


The opinion of this Court issued on April 7, 2004, cited at 364 F.3d 79 is corrected as follows:

At Slip Op. 2672 [ 364 F.3d at 85] delete last sentence on the page:

"Because both UConn and the National Board receive federal funding, they are subject to the provisions of the Rehabilitation Act."


Summaries of

Powell v. N.B.M.E

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Apr 7, 2004
511 F.3d 238 (2d Cir. 2004)
Case details for

Powell v. N.B.M.E

Case Details

Full title:Marie POWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NATIONAL BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Apr 7, 2004

Citations

511 F.3d 238 (2d Cir. 2004)

Citing Cases

Williamson v. American Nat. Ins. Co.

28 C.F.R. § 41.53. The ADA defines undue hardship as one requiring significant difficulties or expense when…

Guarneri v. Schoharie Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Serv.

” Harris v. Mills, 572 F.3d 66, 73 (2d Cir. 2009) (citing Powell v. Nat'l Bd. of Med. Exam'rs, 364 F.3d 79,…