From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Powell v. Mountainside Agency, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term Second Department
May 8, 1997
173 Misc. 2d 672 (N.Y. App. Term 1997)

Opinion

May 8, 1997

Thomas P. Halley, Poughkeepsie, for appellant.


MEMORANDUM.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs.

UCCA 1304 in substance provides that where a trial takes place before a court without a jury it must render its decision within 30 days from the time when the case was submitted for that purpose. This section has been held to be mandatory and the failure to render a decision within said period affords the parties the right to seek a new trial (see, Nelson v. Di Lallo, 54 Misc.2d 133; Smith v. Weitz, 14 Misc.2d 519). However, where a decision has been rendered prior to the application for a new trial, the parties are deemed to have waived their right to such relief (see, Murch v. Marelli, NYLJ, May 31, 1990, at 29, col 5 [App Term, 9th 10th Jud Dists]; see also, Empire Crafts Corp. v. Grace China Co., 40 Misc.2d 957, affd 20 A.D.2d 851).

DiPAOLA, P.J., COLLINS and INGRASSIA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Powell v. Mountainside Agency, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term Second Department
May 8, 1997
173 Misc. 2d 672 (N.Y. App. Term 1997)
Case details for

Powell v. Mountainside Agency, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS POWELL, Appellant, v. MOUNTAINSIDE AGENCY, INC., Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term Second Department

Date published: May 8, 1997

Citations

173 Misc. 2d 672 (N.Y. App. Term 1997)
663 N.Y.S.2d 463

Citing Cases

Ragosto v. Triborough Bridges&sTunnel Authority

Pursuant to the terms of General Municipal Law § 50-e(1)(a), the plaintiff was required to serve a notice of…

Murov v. Celentano

Finally, as to Celentano's argument that the judgments were not timely rendered, UCCA 1304, providing for a…