From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Powell v. Fertilizer Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 1933
170 S.E. 916 (N.C. 1933)

Opinion

(Filed 11 October, 1933.)

Guardian and Ward C b —

A guardian executed a note and deed of trust under an order made by the clerk without the approval of the judge. The judge later approved the order nunc pro tunc. Held, the defect was cured. C. S., 2180.

APPEAL by plaintiffs from Barnhill, J., at Chambers, Rocky Mount, 18 March, 1933. From NASH.

A. O. Dickens, M. S. Strickland and Finch, Rand Finch for plaintiffs.

Cooley Bone for defendant, Fertilizer Works.


Civil action by wards to have note and deed of trust signed by their guardian, under order of court, approved by the judge nunc pro tunc, declared null and void, heard upon facts agreed, which resulted in judgment of dismissal. Plaintiffs appeal.


The judgment of the Superior Court is supported by the facts upon which it is agreed the rights of the parties depend.

The note and deed of trust were executed by the guardian pursuant to order of the clerk of the Superior Court, and before same was approved by the judge as required by C. S., 2180, but the judge's approval was later entered nunc pro tunc. This cured the defect. Campbell v. Farley, 158 N.C. 42, 73 S.E. 103. Compare Mann v. Mann, 176 N.C. 353, 97 S.E. 175.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Powell v. Fertilizer Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 1933
170 S.E. 916 (N.C. 1933)
Case details for

Powell v. Fertilizer Co.

Case Details

Full title:MAYSO POWELL ET AL. v. ARMOUR FERTILIZER WORKS ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Oct 1, 1933

Citations

170 S.E. 916 (N.C. 1933)
170 S.E. 916

Citing Cases

Ipock v. Bank

Under these circumstances the Court is of the opinion, and so holds that the judgment nunc pro tunc was…

Godfrey v. Gempler

* * * * * "In Powell v. Armour Fertilizer Works (1933) 205 N.C. 311, 170 S.E. 916, where a note and deed of…