From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Powell v. Cnty. of Solano

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 4, 2021
2:19-cv-2459 DB P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 4, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-cv-2459 DB P

08-04-2021

ADAM CLAYTON POWELL, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SOLANO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

DEBORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff is a former county and current state inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that officers used excessive force against him and denied him medical treatment.

The dispositive motion filing deadline expired on April 13, 2021. (ECF Nos. 15, 22.) Neither party has filed a motion for summary judgment. Therefore, the court will, by this order, direct the parties to show cause why this action should not be set for trial. Should the parties fail to show good cause the court will set this action for trial and direct the parties to file pretrial statements.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to randomly assign this action to a United States District Judge.

2. Within thirty days of the date of this order the parties are directed to show cause why the court should not set this action for trial. Any motion seeking to modify the court's discovery and scheduling order should set forth why that party did not seek an extension of time to file a dispositive motion prior to the expiration of the deadline.


Summaries of

Powell v. Cnty. of Solano

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 4, 2021
2:19-cv-2459 DB P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 4, 2021)
Case details for

Powell v. Cnty. of Solano

Case Details

Full title:ADAM CLAYTON POWELL, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SOLANO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 4, 2021

Citations

2:19-cv-2459 DB P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 4, 2021)