From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Powell v. N.Y.C.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 22, 2014
116 A.D.3d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-04-22

Hollye D. POWELL, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant–Appellant.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Drake A. Colley of counsel), for appellant. Sobel, Ross, Fliegel & Stieglitz, LLP, New York (Michael P. Stieglitz of counsel), for respondent.


Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Drake A. Colley of counsel), for appellant. Sobel, Ross, Fliegel & Stieglitz, LLP, New York (Michael P. Stieglitz of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kibbie F. Payne, J.), entered November 9, 2012, which granted plaintiff's motion pursuant to CPLR 4404(a) to set aside a jury verdict in defendant's favor, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, and the motion denied. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment dismissing the complaint.

The jury's verdict, that plaintiff's slip-and-fall accident was not a proximate cause of her injuries, was based on a fair interpretation of the evidence ( see Grassi v. Ulrich, 87 N.Y.2d 954, 956, 641 N.Y.S.2d 588, 664 N.E.2d 499 [1996];Goldstein v. Snyder, 3 A.D.3d 332, 334, 770 N.Y.S.2d 327 [1st Dept.2004] ). Indeed, plaintiff's own doctor testified that her degenerative disc disease predated the accident, and that she had a normal neurological exam after the accident. MAZZARELLI, J.P., FRIEDMAN, DeGRASSE, FREEDMAN, KAPNICK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Powell v. N.Y.C.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 22, 2014
116 A.D.3d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Powell v. N.Y.C.

Case Details

Full title:Hollye D. POWELL, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 22, 2014

Citations

116 A.D.3d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
116 A.D.3d 589
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 2704