Powell v. Cascade General, Inc.

Full title: C. SUSAN POWELL, Plaintiff, v. CASCADE GENERAL, INC., an Oregon…

Court: United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Mar 21, 2001

Civil No. 00-442-AS (D. Or. Mar. 21, 2001)

Opinion

Civil No. 00-442-AS

March 21, 2001

ORDER

Malcolm F. Marsh, United States District Judge

Magistrate Judge Donald C. Ashmanskas filed his Findings and Recommendation on February 28, 2001. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R. Civ P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. See § 636(b)(1)(C); Simpson v. Lear Astronics Corp., 77 F.3d 1170, 1174-5 (9th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Ashmanskas' Findings and Recommendation #27.

Defendant's motion (#13) for summary judgment is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.