From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pouncy v. Palmer

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Oct 2, 2024
13-cv-14695 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 2, 2024)

Opinion

13-cv-14695

10-02-2024

OMAR RASHAD POUNCY, Petitioner, v. CARMEN D. PALMER, Respondent.


ORDER DENYING MOTION TO EXPEDITE BRIEFING SCHEDULE (ECF NO. 511)

MATTHEW F. LEITMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Now before the Court is a motion by Petitioner Omar Pouncy to modify a briefing schedule set by the Court in connection with Pouncy's pending motion for indicative ruling. The motion to expedite is DENIED because the Court is not persuaded that a modification of the schedule is necessary or appropriate. If the Sixth Circuit sets an oral argument date on Pouncy's pending appeal before the expiration of the currently-set briefing schedule, Pouncy may so inform the Court and renew his motion to modify the briefing schedule.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pouncy v. Palmer

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Oct 2, 2024
13-cv-14695 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 2, 2024)
Case details for

Pouncy v. Palmer

Case Details

Full title:OMAR RASHAD POUNCY, Petitioner, v. CARMEN D. PALMER, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Oct 2, 2024

Citations

13-cv-14695 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 2, 2024)